ABSTRACT
Introduction: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to provide primary care services to low-income and underinsured individuals. Los Angeles County (LAC) is a large, diverse county with greater than 10.2 million residents and 8 distinct Service Planning Areas (SPAs) that represent specific geographic regions with variable resources. We aimed to describe colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates (CRCSR) and the screening rate change (SRCs) in LAC overall and for each SPA between 2019 and 2020 to determine where resources are most needed for CRCSR recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): Our data source was the Uniform Data System (UDS), which includes quality data for the FQHCs funded by HRSA. We determined 2019 and 2020 CRCSR for LAC FQHCs overall and for each FQHC, including average-risk patients age 50-74. We then separated FQHCs into quartiles based on SRC and performed mixed-effects logistic regression to determine FQHC-level characteristics associated with the largest decline in CRCSR from 2019 to 2020 (i.e., predictors of category SRC Q1). Lastly, we determined SRC for each SPA in LAC. Result(s): In 2019, there were 58 FQHCs in LAC with 326,473 patients eligible for CRC screening. In 2020, there were 59 FQHCs with 350,405 eligible patients. The median 2020 CRCSR in LAC FQHCs was 37.3%, down from 48.0% in 2019 (2020 median SRC= -9.6%) (Table). In the regression model among all LAC FQHCs, those with higher proportions of patients preferring a non-English language had significantly higher odds of having the largest decline in CRCSR from 2019 to 2020 (SRC Q1) (aOR=3.25, 95% CI=1.22-8.65;data not shown). CRCSR decreased from 2019 to 2020 in all SPAs with SRC ranging from -17.0% (South Bay) to -1.4% (West LA) (Figure). Conclusion(s): In Los Angeles County FQHCs, CRC screening rates were higher than the national FQHC average in 2019 however declined considerably between 2019 and 2020. The decline in CRC screening rates was highest in FQHCs serving a higher proportion of patients with a preference for a non-English language and varied by county region. Our findings highlight the need for targeted measures, including language-appropriate resources, to improve CRC screening uptake in FQHCs that provide care to some of the most historically marginalized individuals.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States (US) and disproportionately impacts Black individuals. The US Preventive Services Taskforce began recommending CRC screening for individuals aged 45-49 in 2021, however effective strategies to increase screening participation in Black individuals in this age group are unknown. Thus, the National Colorectal RoundTable (NCCRT) used a mixed methods approach to identify barriers and facilitators to CRC screening in Black individuals, with specific focus on those age 45-49. Results informed the development of the 2022 NCCRT Messaging Guidebook for Black & African American People. Method(s): We conducted a mixed-methods study in a large, nationally representative sample of unscreened Black individuals. We first conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with Black individuals over age 45, recruited from the Schlesinger Group qualitative research platform. Findings informed content for a subsequent survey to understand barriers and facilitators, administered broadly via the Prodege online research platform. Messages to encourage screening participation were developed based on learnings from prior ACS and NCCRT work. Message were tested using MaxDiff analytic methods and reviewed by a multidisciplinary advisory committee for inclusion in the Guidebook. Result(s): There were 10 qualitative interview and 490 survey participants. The average age of participants was 52.7 (s.d.56.1) for interviews and 55.3 (s.d.57.3) for surveys. 40.0% were female and 38.2% lived in the Southeast US (Table). The most frequently reported barrier to screening was procrastination (40.0% in age 45-49;42.8% in age 50-65;34.2% in age .55). Procrastination was often attributed to financial concerns (20.8% in age 45-49) and COVID-19 (27.0% in age 50-54;21.8% in age .55) (Figure). Of those age 45-49, the majority preferred to receive screening information from a health care provider (57.5%), however only 31.7% reported that a provider had initiated a screening conversation. Several messages rated as highly effective in encouraging screening were included in the NCCRT Guidebook. Conclusion(s): We identified several age-specific barriers to CRC screening and developed unique messaging to motivate screening among unscreened Black individuals age 45 and over. Messages that tested positively are publicly available as a resource for organizations and institutions that aim to increase screening rates.